The Western New York Healthcare Association stands united with the Healthcare Association of New York State and our allied regional associations against a proposed and potentially harmful proposal to extend the statute of limitations in Medical Malpractice legislation. While the bill (S.911-A--2015 (Libous)) seems to be a positive step for patients, in reality the legislation stands to increase costs and scheduling burdens on courts statewide, while further driving physicians out of New York State as the proposal's lax timeline is highly likely to increase medical malpractice insurance costs for practitioners:
Legislation (A.285 and S.911-A) backed by New York’s trial
lawyers would change New York State’s medical malpractice statute of
limitations. While patients who are the
victims of malpractice deserve justice and fair compensation, this proposed law
does nothing to further those goals. In
fact, it would have negative consequences for our entire healthcare system.
New York’s world class doctors and hospitals already spend
billions annually on medical malpractice coverage—the highest in the
nation. This legislation would increase
these already enormous costs by hundreds of millions of dollars and further
divert vital patient care resources.
New York’s medical malpractice statute of limitations is
among the longest in the nation, with important exceptions for children and
patients undergoing continued treatment.
Unlike New York State, many states with provisions similar
to those in this bill also have reasonable caps on the amount that can be
recovered for pain and suffering, and some even cap total damages.
This proposed legislation is the wrong approach to fix New
York’s medical malpractice system.
We urge the New York State Legislature to consider a
comprehensive package of medical malpractice reforms that will strengthen New York’s
entire health care system, and to reject
piecemeal legislation.
Click on the images below; right-click, and click on 'view image' then click on plus sign to magnify view of our Letter to the Editor and Memo of Opposition to S-911A, here:
--END--
No comments:
Post a Comment